U.K.’s Queen Elizabeth not told before Australia’s historic PM sacking: archived letters

U.K.’s Queen Elizabeth not told before Australia’s historic PM sacking: archived letters
SYDNEY — Queen Elizabeth’s representative in Australia fired a prime minister without warning the palace — or the prime minister — because “under the constitution the responsibility is mine”, according to archived letters released on Tuesday.

In a Nov. 11, 1975 dispatch, Governor-General John Kerr told the Queen’s private secretary he took the unprecedented step to sack Prime Minister Gough Whitlam as Whitlam prepared to end a months-long budget standoff by calling a partial Senate election.

“I decided to take this step … without informing the Palace in advance,” Kerr wrote to former private secretary Martin Charteris on the day of Whitlam’s dismissal.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

“It was better for Her Majesty not to know in advance, though it is … my duty to tell her immediately,” Kerr added, according to the documents.

The release of 211 so-called “palace letters” pulls the veil from one of the great mysteries of Australian politics, and may reignite a conversation about whether the country should cut ties with Britain and become a republic.

Whitlam’s firing remains one of the country’s most polarizing political events because it represented an unprecedented level of intervention by the Commonwealth.

The box containing letters between former Australian Governor-General Sir John Kerr and Buckingham Palace during a release event in Canberra, Australia, on Tuesday.LUKAS COCH / EPA

Historians say the country was never told the full story, and in 2016 a historian sued the National Archives of Australia for access to letters between Kerr and the queen. The lawsuit failed on grounds that the letters were private, but the High Court overturned the ruling in May.

The letters show Kerr and Buckingham Palace discussed the political crisis gripping the country, and Kerr’s role in it, for two months before Whitlam’s sacking as the prime minister tried to get parliament to approve his Budget.

His efforts were rewarded, by the palace at least. The day after he sacked Whitlam, Charteris congratulated Kerr on his judgment.

“In not informing The Queen what you intended to do before doing it, you acted not only with perfect constitutional propriety but also with consideration for Her Majesty’s position,” he wrote.

XL subscribe to our newsletter banner

Get the latest news and advice on COVID-19, direct from the experts in your inbox. Join hundreds of thousands who trust experts by subscribing to our newsletter.

Send your news and stories to us news@climaxradio.co.uk or newstories@climaxnewsroom.com and WhatsApp: +447747873668.

Before you go...

Democratic norms are being stress-tested all over the world, and the past few years have thrown up all kinds of questions we didn't know needed clarifying – how long is too long for a parliamentary prorogation? How far should politicians be allowed to intervene in court cases? To monitor these issues as closely as we have in the past we need your support, so please consider donating to The Climax News Room.