- Sen. Susan Collins of Maine said in a statement Saturday that the president elected on November 3 should be the one to fill the Supreme Court vacancy left by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death.
- Collins did not outright refuse to vote on a nominee ahead of the election, but said it would be more fair and consistent for the Senate to wait.
- Republican leadership already announced Friday they would immediately move to vote on whomever President Donald Trump nominates ahead of the election.
- Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.
Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, one of the most vulnerable Republicans facing re-election in the Senate, said in a statement on Saturday that she didn’t believe the Senate should vote on a Supreme Court nominee before the November 3 presidential election.
But Collins’ statement stopped short of a refusal to vote on a nominee before the election, merely saying she believed it would be most fair to wait.
“In order for the American people to have faith in their elected officials, we must act fairly and consistently — no matter which political party is in power,” Collins’ statement said.
She added that she would have “no objection” to beginning the process of reviewing President Donald Trump’s nominee’s credentials, but that the vote should wait.
“Given the proximity of the presidential election, however, I do not believe that the Senate should vote on the nominee prior to the election,” she continued. “In fairness to the American people, who will either be re-electing the President or selecting a new one, the decision on a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court should be made by the President who is elected on November 3rd.”
Senate Republicans announced Friday night they would move immediately to confirm a new Supreme Court justice to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died earlier that day.
Democrats responded with outrage, noting that Republicans refused in the spring of 2016 to vote on then-President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee.
Republicans had argued at the time that the Senate shouldn’t vote on a new Supreme Court justice during an election year, and that the next president should be the one to fill the vacancy.
- Read more:
- High profile issues are now at stake on the Supreme Court in the wake of Ginsburg’s death
- Chuck Schumer: If GOP tries to fill Ginsburg’s seat, ‘nothing is off the table next year’
- Trump says he has an ‘obligation’ to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg ‘without delay’ amid reports he plans to name a nominee within days
- Obama says RBG ‘fought to the end, through her cancer, with unwavering faith in our democracy and its ideals’ and calls for the next president to fill her vacancy
Send your news and stories to us email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org and WhatsApp: +447747873668.
Before you go...
Democratic norms are being stress-tested all over the world, and the past few years have thrown up all kinds of questions we didn't know needed clarifying – how long is too long for a parliamentary prorogation? How far should politicians be allowed to intervene in court cases? To monitor these issues as closely as we have in the past we need your support, so please consider donating to The Climax News Room.