“Government policy now permits patients to receive prescriptions for powerful opioids without leaving home, yet still requires women to travel to a doctor’s office to pick up mifepristone, only to turn around, go home, and ingest it without supervision,” they wrote. They also said the Trump administration failed to prove how it would be harmed by letting mail delivery of the pills to continue while courts weighed the merits of the case.
A short-handed Supreme Court had declined to intervene in the same case in October, allowing abortion clinics to continue dispensing the pills through telemedicine and through the mail, which they say has kept patients and staff safer during the pandemic.
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to reconsider its request after Barrett joined the bench. The administration said continuing to enforce longstanding FDA rules on mifepristone, which was approved 20 years ago, “does not create a substantial burden on abortion access.”
The American Civil Liberties Union, which represented abortion clinics challenging the FDA rules, said in a statement that the court’s decision “exposes patients to needless COVID-19 risks” and called on the incoming Biden administration to scrap the FDA rule.
“It is mind-boggling that the Trump administration’s top priority on its way out the door is to needlessly endanger even more people during this dark pandemic winter — and chilling that the Supreme Court allowed it,” said Julia Kaye, a staff attorney at the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project.
The ACLU in separate litigation is also pushing for the courts to permanently lift FDA restrictions on abortion medication, which is the most common method of abortion in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy. Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers and anti-abortion groups have called on FDA to revoke access to the abortion pill entirely.
Send your news and stories to us firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com and WhatsApp: +447747873668.
Before you go...
Democratic norms are being stress-tested all over the world, and the past few years have thrown up all kinds of questions we didn't know needed clarifying – how long is too long for a parliamentary prorogation? How far should politicians be allowed to intervene in court cases? To monitor these issues as closely as we have in the past we need your support, so please consider donating to The Climax News Room.