Apple wins $15 billion EU court appeal over Irish tax scheme

Apple wins $15 billion EU court appeal over Irish tax scheme
Last Chance: Register for Transform, VB’s AI event of the year, hosted online July 15-17.

A European appeals court ruled today that Apple does not have to pay a $15 billion tax bill levied by the European Commission, which had accused the tech giant of abusing Irish tax laws.

The European General Court determined European Commission officials failed to demonstrate that Apple had gained an unfair competitive advantage through the Irish tax laws. Following a lengthy investigation, the commission had previously issued a finding that Apple had massively reduced its tax bills by overstating the amount of its business in Ireland, where it received low tax rates. The commission had ordered the company to reimburse Irish authorities up to $15 billion.

The decision represents a big win for Apple, which has always denied any wrongdoing. It’s also a setback for European leaders who have built a platform on policing tech companies. The commission must now decide whether to appeal the ruling to the highest court, the European Court of Justice.

Le #TribunalUE annule la décision de la @EU_Commission sur des rulings fiscaux irlandais en faveur d’ @Apple #taxruling #Apple #EUCommission #AidedEtat

— Cour de justice UE (@CourUEPresse) July 15, 2020

Technically, the original ruling by the commission four years ago was against the Irish government for creating tax breaks that gave the country an unfair economic advantage over other European nations. As a result, the EC ordered Ireland to send Apple a tax bill for $15 billion.

Ireland appealed that decision, though this put it in the politically awkward spot of fighting a decision that would have landed $15 billion in its national treasury. But Irish politicians wanted to protect the country’s status as a low-tax haven, which has attracted tech giants like Facebook, Google, and Apple.

Given Apple’s massive cash haul each quarter, the company would have been fine regardless of the final decision and had already placed the money in an escrow account.

Still, the accusation that it had benefited from a fraudulent tax scheme tarnished the reputation of a company that presents itself as squeaky clean.

XL subscribe to our newsletter banner

Get the latest news and advice on COVID-19, direct from the experts in your inbox. Join hundreds of thousands who trust experts by subscribing to our newsletter.

Send your news and stories to us or and WhatsApp: +447747873668.

Before you go...

Democratic norms are being stress-tested all over the world, and the past few years have thrown up all kinds of questions we didn't know needed clarifying – how long is too long for a parliamentary prorogation? How far should politicians be allowed to intervene in court cases? To monitor these issues as closely as we have in the past we need your support, so please consider donating to The Climax News Room.